Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
In a dispute over new rules exempting groups with religious or moral objections from the ACA's contraceptive mandate, the Court ruled the rules were valid, as the departments had authority to issue them and the process did not violate the APA.· AI-written
140 S. Ct. 2367 · No. 19-431 · 2019 term · Roberts Court
Decided Jul 8, 2020 · argued May 6, 2020
Judicial power · Judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures
Majority opinion: Clarence Thomas
The voteMajorityDissent
7–27 in the majority, 2 in dissent
2 dissents (7–2)
Reversed and remanded. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home won.
What this ruling means
Reversed and remanded: the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit and sent the case back to that court for further proceedings that follow the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Won” means the Court gave that side the result it asked for.
From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.
Summary
The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, 591 U.S. 657 (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case involving ongoing conflicts between the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) over the ACA's contraceptive mandate. The ACA exempts nonprofit religious organizations from complying with the mandate, to which for-profit religious organizations objected.
The case is a result of prior court actions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., in 2014, and Zubik v. Burwell, in 2016, which left the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to promulgate new regulations on the mandate. President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order to the HHS to bypass the traditional regulatory process, leading HHS to devise new rules in late 2017 to give for-profit groups exemptions for religious or moral objections to the mandate. Several states sued the federal government, and multiple Circuit Courts placed injunctions on the new rules as arbitrary and capricious and required by neither the ACA or the RFRA, violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). This case was a consolidation of two appeals from the injunction placed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The Supreme Court ruled on July 8, 2020, in a 7–2 decision that the new rules were valid, as the associated departments had the authority to promulgate the exemptions, and that the process to put the rules in place did not violate the APA.
Data notes
The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.
How the justices voted
Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 2019 term. Filled: the 7 in the majority. Hollow: the 2 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.
Majority(7)
Clarence ThomasWrote the majority opinion
Elena KaganWrote a concurrence
Samuel AlitoWrote a concurrence
Stephen BreyerJoined the majority
John RobertsJoined the majority
Brett KavanaughJoined the majority
Neil GorsuchJoined the majority
Dissent(2)
Ruth GinsburgWrote a dissent
Sonia SotomayorJoined a dissent
Data notes
Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.
Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.
The parties
Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.
- Petitioner
- Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul HomeReligious organization, institution, or person
- Respondent
- PennsylvaniaState (Pennsylvania)
- Reached the Court by
- Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
Data notes
The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.
The law at issue
The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.
- Provision
- Affordable Care Act
- Kind of law
- Infrequently litigated statutes
- Decided by
- Statutory construction; Judicial review (national level)
Data notes
The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.
Timeline
What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.
- Jul 8, 2020DecidedDecided · Decided 7–2: reversed and remanded. Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home won.
- May 6, 2020ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
- Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari).
- Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit: affirmed.
- Not datedBeganBegan · The case began in the Pennsylvania Eastern U.S. District Court.
Data notes
From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.
Other decisions on the same issue
167 other argued cases since 1946 on judicial review of administrative agency's or administrative official's actions and procedures, newest first.
- Mullin v. DoeLandmark146 S. Ct. 2121Jun 25, 2026 · 146 S. Ct. 2121Judicial powerLandmark6–36–3 band
- Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency145 S. Ct. 2121Jun 20, 2025 · 145 S. Ct. 2121Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas145 S. Ct. 1762Jun 18, 2025 · 145 S. Ct. 1762Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission598 U.S. 175Apr 14, 2023 · 598 U.S. 175Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Babcock v. Kijakazi142 S. Ct. 641Jan 13, 2022 · 142 S. Ct. 641Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Carr v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security141 S. Ct. 1352Apr 22, 2021 · 141 S. Ct. 1352Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Department of Commerce v. New York139 S. Ct. 2551Jun 27, 2019 · 139 S. Ct. 2551Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Kisor v. Wilkie139 S. Ct. 2400Jun 26, 2019 · 139 S. Ct. 2400Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Azar v. Allina Health Services139 S. Ct. 1804Jun 3, 2019 · 139 S. Ct. 1804Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.137 S. Ct. 1975Jun 23, 2017 · 137 S. Ct. 1975Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Mach Mining, LLC, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission575 U.S. 480Apr 29, 2015 · 575 U.S. 480Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- City of Arlington, Texas, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Communications Commission et al.569 U.S. 290May 20, 2013 · 569 U.S. 290Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Auburn Regional Medical Center et al.568 U.S. 145Jan 22, 2013 · 568 U.S. 145Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Elgin v. Department of Treasury567 U.S. 1Jun 11, 2012 · 567 U.S. 1Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Astra USA, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Santa Clara County, California563 U.S. 110Mar 29, 2011 · 563 U.S. 110Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations Board560 U.S. 674Jun 17, 2010 · 560 U.S. 674Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Federal Communications Commission, et al. v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., et al.556 U.S. 502Apr 28, 2009 · 556 U.S. 502Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Zuni Public School District No. 89, et al. v. Department of Education, et al.550 U.S. 81Apr 17, 2007 · 550 U.S. 81Judicial power5–45–4 band
- National Cable & Telecommunications Association, et al. v. Brand X Internet Services, et al.545 U.S. 967Jun 27, 2005 · 545 U.S. 967Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Claude M. Ballard, et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue544 U.S. 40Mar 7, 2005 · 544 U.S. 40Judicial power7–27–2 band
- United States, et al. v. Thomas Lamar Bean537 U.S. 71Dec 10, 2002 · 537 U.S. 71Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Tracy Ragsdale, et al. v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.535 U.S. 81Mar 19, 2002 · 535 U.S. 81Judicial power5–45–4 band
- New York et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al.535 U.S. 1Mar 4, 2002 · 535 U.S. 1Judicial power6–36–3 band
- National Cable & Telecommunications Association, Inc. v. Gulf Power Company et al.534 U.S. 327Jan 16, 2002 · 534 U.S. 327Judicial power6–27–2 band
- United States Postal Service v. Maria A. Gregory534 U.S. 1Nov 13, 2001 · 534 U.S. 1Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Mead Corporation533 U.S. 218Jun 18, 2001 · 533 U.S. 218Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Juatassa Sims v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security530 U.S. 103Jun 5, 2000 · 530 U.S. 103Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Q. Todd Dickinson, Acting Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Mary E. Zurko et al.527 U.S. 150Jun 10, 1999 · 527 U.S. 150Judicial power6–36–3 band
- United States v. Haggar Apparel Company526 U.S. 380Apr 21, 1999 · 526 U.S. 380Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Your Home Visiting Nurse Services, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services525 U.S. 449Feb 23, 1999 · 525 U.S. 449Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Regions Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services522 U.S. 448Feb 24, 1998 · 522 U.S. 448Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A.517 U.S. 735Jun 3, 1996 · 517 U.S. 735Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Katia Gutierrez de Martinez, Eduardo Martinez Puccini and Henny Martinez de Papaiani v. Dirk A. Lamagno et al.515 U.S. 417Jun 14, 1995 · 515 U.S. 417Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Guernsey Memorial Hospital514 U.S. 87Mar 6, 1995 · 514 U.S. 87Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A., et al. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance Co. et al.513 U.S. 251Jan 19, 1995 · 513 U.S. 251Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Transcon Lines, et al.513 U.S. 138Jan 10, 1995 · 513 U.S. 138Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Thomas Jefferson University, dba Thomas Jefferson University Hospital v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services512 U.S. 504Jun 24, 1994 · 512 U.S. 504Judicial power5–45–4 band
- John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, et al. v. Arlen Specter et al.511 U.S. 462May 23, 1994 · 511 U.S. 462Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Abf Freight System, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board510 U.S. 317Jan 24, 1994 · 510 U.S. 317Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc., et al.508 U.S. 439Jun 7, 1993 · 508 U.S. 439Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Good Samaritan Hospital, et al. v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services508 U.S. 402Jun 7, 1993 · 508 U.S. 402Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Michael E. Lincoln, Acting Director of the Indian Health Service, et al. v. Grover Vigil et al.508 U.S. 182May 24, 1993 · 508 U.S. 182Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Peter C. Reiter, et al. v. Langdon M. Cooper, Trustee for Carolina Motor Express, Inc., et al.507 U.S. 258Mar 8, 1993 · 507 U.S. 258Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Barbara Franklin, Secretary of Commerce, et al. v. Massachusetts et al.505 U.S. 788Jun 26, 1992 · 505 U.S. 788Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al. v. Boston and Maine Corporation, et al.503 U.S. 407Mar 25, 1992 · 503 U.S. 407Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Harriet Pauley, Survivor of John C. Pauley v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc., et al501 U.S. 680Jun 24, 1991 · 501 U.S. 680Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Gene McNary, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, et al. v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc., et al.498 U.S. 479Feb 20, 1991 · 498 U.S. 479Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Mobil Oil Exploration & Producing Southeast, Inc., et al. v. United Distribution Companies et al.498 U.S. 211Jan 8, 1991 · 498 U.S. 211Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc., et al. v. Primary Steel, Inc., et al.497 U.S. 116Jun 21, 1990 · 497 U.S. 116Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor, et al. v. United Steelworkers of America et al.494 U.S. 26Feb 21, 1990 · 494 U.S. 26Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Bowen, Otis R., Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Georgetown University Hospital, et al.488 U.S. 204Dec 12, 1988 · 488 U.S. 204Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Bethesda Hospital Association, et al. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services485 U.S. 399Apr 4, 1988 · 485 U.S. 399Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Etsi Pipeline Project v. Missouri et al.484 U.S. 495Feb 23, 1988 · 484 U.S. 495Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- National Labor Relations Board et al. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23, AFL-CIO484 U.S. 112Dec 14, 1987 · 484 U.S. 112Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al.482 U.S. 270Jun 8, 1987 · 482 U.S. 270Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor et al.478 U.S. 833Jul 7, 1986 · 478 U.S. 833Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Young, Commissioner of Food and Drug Administration v. Community Nutrition Institute et al.476 U.S. 974Jun 16, 1986 · 476 U.S. 974Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians et al.476 U.S. 667Jun 9, 1986 · 476 U.S. 667Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Pierce County476 U.S. 253May 19, 1986 · 476 U.S. 253Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. City of Fulton et al.475 U.S. 657Apr 7, 1986 · 475 U.S. 657Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp. et al.474 U.S. 361Jan 22, 1986 · 474 U.S. 361Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Chaney et al.470 U.S. 821Mar 20, 1985 · 470 U.S. 821Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management470 U.S. 768Mar 20, 1985 · 470 U.S. 768Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion, dba Center for Nuclear Responsibility, et al.470 U.S. 729Mar 20, 1985 · 470 U.S. 729Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Aluminum Company of America et al. v. Central Lincoln Peoples' Utility District et al.467 U.S. 380Jun 5, 1984 · 467 U.S. 380Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Block, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Community Nutrition Institute et al.467 U.S. 340Jun 4, 1984 · 467 U.S. 340Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Mid-Louisiana Gas Co. et al.463 U.S. 319Jun 28, 1983 · 463 U.S. 319Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States, Inc., et al. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. et al.463 U.S. 29Jun 24, 1983 · 463 U.S. 29Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- National Association of Greeting Card Publishers v. United States Postal Service et al.462 U.S. 810Jun 22, 1983 · 462 U.S. 810Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Bowsher, Comptroller General of the United States, et al. v. Merck & Co., Inc.460 U.S. 824Apr 19, 1983 · 460 U.S. 824Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Burlington Northern Inc. et al. v. United States et al.459 U.S. 131Dec 13, 1982 · 459 U.S. 131Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Federal Trade Commission et al. v. Standard Oil Company of California449 U.S. 232Dec 15, 1980 · 449 U.S. 232Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. et al. v. Shell Oil Co. et al.444 U.S. 572Feb 20, 1980 · 444 U.S. 572Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. McCombs et al.442 U.S. 529Jun 18, 1979 · 442 U.S. 529Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp. et al.442 U.S. 444Jun 11, 1979 · 442 U.S. 444Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al.435 U.S. 519Apr 3, 1978 · 435 U.S. 519Judicial power7–0Unanimous band
- Califano, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare v. Sanders430 U.S. 99Feb 23, 1977 · 430 U.S. 99Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- United States et al. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. et al.426 U.S. 500Jun 17, 1976 · 426 U.S. 500Judicial power6–27–2 band
- Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.426 U.S. 290Jun 7, 1976 · 426 U.S. 290Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior v. Delta Mining, Inc., et al.423 U.S. 403Jan 26, 1976 · 423 U.S. 403Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- National Independent Coal Operators' Association et al. v. Kleppe, Secretary of the Interior, et al.423 U.S. 388Jan 26, 1976 · 423 U.S. 388Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Dunlop, Secretary of Labor v. Bachowski et al.421 U.S. 560Jun 2, 1975 · 421 U.S. 560Judicial power8–18–1 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Food Store Employees Union, Local 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO417 U.S. 1May 20, 1974 · 417 U.S. 1Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- National Cable Television Assn., Inc. v. United States et al.415 U.S. 336Mar 4, 1974 · 415 U.S. 336Judicial power5–27–2 band
- Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. Glover Livestock Commission Co., Inc.411 U.S. 182Mar 28, 1973 · 411 U.S. 182Judicial power7–27–2 band
- United States et al. v. Florida East Coast Railway Co. et al.410 U.S. 224Jan 22, 1973 · 410 U.S. 224Judicial power6–27–2 band
- S&E Contractors, Inc. v. United States406 U.S. 1Apr 24, 1972 · 406 U.S. 1Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. et al. v. Rederiaktiebolaget Transatlantic400 U.S. 62Dec 8, 1970 · 400 U.S. 62Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. First Mortgage 4% Bondholders Committee v. United States et al.399 U.S. 392Jun 29, 1970 · 399 U.S. 392Judicial power4–27–2 band
- Tooahnippah (Goombi), Administratrix, et al. v. Hickel, Secretary of the Interior, et al.397 U.S. 598Apr 27, 1970 · 397 U.S. 598Judicial power7–18–1 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al.396 U.S. 258Dec 15, 1969 · 396 U.S. 258Judicial power5–36–3 band
- City of Chicago et al. v. United States et al.396 U.S. 162Dec 9, 1969 · 396 U.S. 162Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.394 U.S. 759Apr 23, 1969 · 394 U.S. 759Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission et al.393 U.S. 186Nov 25, 1968 · 393 U.S. 186Judicial power6–27–2 band
- World Airways, Inc., et al. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., et al.391 U.S. 461May 27, 1968 · 391 U.S. 461Judicial power4–45–4 band
- Federal Maritime Commission et al. v. Aktiebolaget Svenska Amerika Linien (Swedish American Line) et al.390 U.S. 238Mar 6, 1968 · 390 U.S. 238Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.389 U.S. 179Dec 4, 1967 · 389 U.S. 179Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Federal Power Commission et al.387 U.S. 428Jun 5, 1967 · 387 U.S. 428Judicial power6–27–2 band
- American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.387 U.S. 397May 29, 1967 · 387 U.S. 397Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Chicago & North Western Railway Co. et al. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.387 U.S. 326May 29, 1967 · 387 U.S. 326Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Federal Trade Commission v. Universal-Rundle Corp.387 U.S. 244May 29, 1967 · 387 U.S. 244Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al. v. Toilet Goods Association, Inc., et al.387 U.S. 167May 22, 1967 · 387 U.S. 167Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Toilet Goods Association, Inc., et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.387 U.S. 158May 22, 1967 · 387 U.S. 158Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Abbott Laboratories et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al.387 U.S. 136May 22, 1967 · 387 U.S. 136Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Canada Packers, Ltd. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. et al.385 U.S. 182Dec 5, 1966 · 385 U.S. 182Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.385 U.S. 157Dec 5, 1966 · 385 U.S. 157Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.385 U.S. 57Nov 14, 1966 · 385 U.S. 57Judicial power8–18–1 band
- United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.384 U.S. 424Jun 6, 1966 · 384 U.S. 424Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.384 U.S. 394Jun 6, 1966 · 384 U.S. 394Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime Commission et al.383 U.S. 607Mar 22, 1966 · 383 U.S. 607Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.382 U.S. 257Dec 8, 1965 · 382 U.S. 257Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mary Carter Paint Co. et al.382 U.S. 46Nov 8, 1965 · 382 U.S. 46Judicial power7–18–1 band
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. et al.381 U.S. 392Jun 1, 1965 · 381 U.S. 392Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission381 U.S. 357Jun 1, 1965 · 381 U.S. 357Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Federal Communications Commission v. Schreiber et al.381 U.S. 279May 24, 1965 · 381 U.S. 279Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. Association for the Benefit of Non-Contract Employees380 U.S. 650Apr 28, 1965 · 380 U.S. 650Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Tallman et al.380 U.S. 1Mar 1, 1965 · 380 U.S. 1Judicial power7–0Unanimous band
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co. et al.379 U.S. 411Jan 18, 1965 · 379 U.S. 411Judicial power7–27–2 band
- All States Freight, Inc., et al. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.379 U.S. 343Dec 14, 1964 · 379 U.S. 343Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina et al.376 U.S. 93Feb 17, 1964 · 376 U.S. 93Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.371 U.S. 156Dec 3, 1962 · 371 U.S. 156Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.370 U.S. 76Jun 4, 1962 · 370 U.S. 76Judicial power6–18–1 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ochoa Fertilizer Corp. et al.368 U.S. 318Dec 18, 1961 · 368 U.S. 318Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Texas Gas Transmission Corp. et al. v. Shell Oil Co.363 U.S. 263Jun 13, 1960 · 363 U.S. 263Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. United States363 U.S. 202Jun 13, 1960 · 363 U.S. 202Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Leedom et al., Members of the National Labor Relations Board, v. Kyne358 U.S. 184Dec 15, 1958 · 358 U.S. 184Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, v. Florida Citrus Exchange et al.358 U.S. 153Dec 15, 1958 · 358 U.S. 153Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hotel Employees Local No. 255, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, et al. v. Leedom, Chairman, National Labor Relations Board, et al.358 U.S. 99Nov 24, 1958 · 358 U.S. 99Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Lewis et al. v. National Labor Relations Board357 U.S. 10Jun 9, 1958 · 357 U.S. 10Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Duval Jewelry Company of Miami, Inc., et al.357 U.S. 1Jun 9, 1958 · 357 U.S. 1Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc., v. United States et al.355 U.S. 554Mar 3, 1958 · 355 U.S. 554Judicial power8–18–1 band
- American Airlines, Inc., v. North American Airlines, Inc., et al.355 U.S. 465Feb 3, 1958 · 355 U.S. 465Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Moog Industries, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission355 U.S. 411Jan 27, 1958 · 355 U.S. 411Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Conley et al.v. Gibson et al.355 U.S. 41Nov 18, 1957 · 355 U.S. 41Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Hermann et al.353 U.S. 322May 6, 1957 · 353 U.S. 322Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Leedom et al., Members of the National Labor Relations Board v. International Union of Mine, Mill & Smelter Workers352 U.S. 145Dec 10, 1956 · 352 U.S. 145Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.352 U.S. 77Dec 3, 1956 · 352 U.S. 77Judicial power6–18–1 band
- United States v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. et al.352 U.S. 59Dec 3, 1956 · 352 U.S. 59Judicial power6–18–1 band
- Frozen Food Express v. United States et al.351 U.S. 40Apr 23, 1956 · 351 U.S. 40Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United States et al.350 U.S. 162Jan 9, 1956 · 350 U.S. 162Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Allen, Chairman, Twelfth Region Wage Stabilization Board, et al. v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.347 U.S. 535May 24, 1954 · 347 U.S. 535Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Federal Communications Commission v. Rca Communications, Inc.346 U.S. 86Jun 8, 1953 · 346 U.S. 86Judicial power6–18–1 band
- King et al., Constituting the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission, v. United States et al.344 U.S. 254Dec 22, 1952 · 344 U.S. 254Judicial power6–36–3 band
- United States et al. v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.344 U.S. 33Nov 10, 1952 · 344 U.S. 33Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.344 U.S. 17Nov 10, 1952 · 344 U.S. 17Judicial power7–0Unanimous band
- Blackmar v. Guerre, Regional Manager, Veterans' Administration, et al.342 U.S. 512Mar 3, 1952 · 342 U.S. 512Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Brannan, Secretary of Agriculture, v. Stark et al.342 U.S. 451Mar 3, 1952 · 342 U.S. 451Judicial power4–36–3 band
- United States v. Wunderlich et al.342 U.S. 98Nov 26, 1951 · 342 U.S. 98Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Radio Corporation of America et al. v. United States et al.341 U.S. 412May 28, 1951 · 341 U.S. 412Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.340 U.S. 498Feb 26, 1951 · 340 U.S. 498Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board340 U.S. 474Feb 26, 1951 · 340 U.S. 474Judicial power7–27–2 band
- United States et al. v. Texas & Pacific Motor Transport Co.340 U.S. 450Feb 26, 1951 · 340 U.S. 450Judicial power5–45–4 band
- United States et al. v. Rock Island Motor Transit Co. et al.340 U.S. 419Feb 26, 1951 · 340 U.S. 419Judicial power5–45–4 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gullett Gin Co.340 U.S. 361Jan 15, 1951 · 340 U.S. 361Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.340 U.S. 216Jan 2, 1951 · 340 U.S. 216Judicial power8–18–1 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pool Manufacturing Co.339 U.S. 577May 15, 1950 · 339 U.S. 577Judicial power7–27–2 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.339 U.S. 563May 15, 1950 · 339 U.S. 563Judicial power7–27–2 band
- United States et al. v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. et al.339 U.S. 186Mar 27, 1950 · 339 U.S. 186Judicial power6–18–1 band
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.338 U.S. 632Feb 6, 1950 · 338 U.S. 632Judicial power7–0Unanimous band
- Chapman, Secretary of the Interior, v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co., Inc.338 U.S. 621Feb 6, 1950 · 338 U.S. 621Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co. et al.338 U.S. 604Feb 6, 1950 · 338 U.S. 604Judicial power7–18–1 band
- United States v. Moorman et al., Doing Business As J. W. Moorman & Son338 U.S. 457Jan 9, 1950 · 338 U.S. 457Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission et al.337 U.S. 426Jun 20, 1949 · 337 U.S. 426Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.333 U.S. 103Feb 9, 1948 · 333 U.S. 103Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Williams et al. v. Fanning, Postmaster of Los Angeles332 U.S. 490Dec 8, 1947 · 332 U.S. 490Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Patterson, Secretary of War, et al. v. Lamb329 U.S. 539Jan 20, 1947 · 329 U.S. 539Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Parker et al. v. Fleming, Temporary Controls Administrator329 U.S. 531Jan 20, 1947 · 329 U.S. 531Judicial power6–36–3 band
Data notes
Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.
Official record
Read the argument audio on Oyez and Wikipedia. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.