Johnson v. Massachusetts
390 U.S. 511 · No. 702 · 1967 term · Warren Court
Decided Apr 1, 1968 · argued Mar 6, 1968
Judicial power · No merits: writ improvidently granted
The voteMajorityDissent
6–36 in the majority, 3 in dissent
3 dissents (6–3)
Petition denied or appeal dismissed. Johnson lost.
What this ruling means
Dismissed: after hearing the case the Supreme Court declined to decide it, so the decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Court stands.
Johnson was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Lost” means the Court did not give that side the result it asked for.
From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.
Summary
The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.
Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.
Data notes
The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.
How the justices voted
Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1967 term. Filled: the 6 in the majority. Hollow: the 3 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.
Majority(6)
William DouglasJoined the majority
William BrennanJoined the majority
Hugo BlackJoined the majority
Potter StewartJoined the majority
Byron WhiteJoined the majority
John HarlanJoined the majority
Dissent(3)
Thurgood MarshallWrote a dissent
Abe FortasJoined a dissent
Earl WarrenJoined a dissent
Data notes
Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.
Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.
The parties
Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.
- Petitioner
- JohnsonPerson accused, indicted, or suspected of crime
- Respondent
- MassachusettsState (Massachusetts)
- Reached the Court by
- Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
Data notes
The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.
The law at issue
The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.
- Provision
- Writ Improvidently Granted
- Kind of law
- Other
- Decided by
- Supreme Court supervision of lower federal or state courts or original jurisdiction
Data notes
The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.
Timeline
What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.
- Apr 1, 1968DecidedDecided · Decided 6–3: petition denied or appeal dismissed. Johnson lost.
- Mar 6, 1968ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
- Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari).
- Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Decided by the Massachusetts Supreme Court: affirmed.
- Not datedBeganBegan · The case began in the Massachusetts trial court.
Data notes
From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.
Other decisions on the same issue
104 other argued cases since 1946 on no merits: writ improvidently granted, newest first.
- Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Davis145 S. Ct. 1608Jun 5, 2025 · 145 S. Ct. 1608Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder Ab604 U.S. 20Dec 11, 2024 · 604 U.S. 20Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank604 U.S. 4Nov 22, 2024 · 604 U.S. 4Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Duncan v. Owens577 U.S. 189Jan 20, 2016 · 577 U.S. 189Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Jonathan Edward Boyer, Petitioner v. Louisiana569 U.S. 238Apr 29, 2013 · 569 U.S. 238Judicial power5–45–4 band
- First American Financial Corporation, Successor in Interest to the First American Corporation, et al., Petitioners v. Denise P. Edwards567 U.S. 756Jun 28, 2012 · 567 U.S. 756Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Alexander Vasquez, Petitioner v. United States.566 U.S. 376Apr 2, 2012 · 566 U.S. 376Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Jose Tolentino, Petitioner v. New York563 U.S. 123Mar 29, 2011 · 563 U.S. 123Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Mayola Williams, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jesse D. Williams, Deceased556 U.S. 178Mar 31, 2009 · 556 U.S. 178Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Edward Nathaniel Bell v. Loretta K. Kelly, Warden555 U.S. 55Nov 17, 2008 · 555 U.S. 55Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Reymundo Toledo-Flores v. United States549 U.S. 69Dec 5, 2006 · 549 U.S. 69Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, dba Labcorp v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc., et al.548 U.S. 124Jun 22, 2006 · 548 U.S. 124Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Maryland v. Leeander Jerome Blake546 U.S. 72Nov 14, 2005 · 546 U.S. 72Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Jose Ernesto Medellin v. Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division544 U.S. 660May 23, 2005 · 544 U.S. 660Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Marlon Latodd Howell, aka Marlon Cox v. Mississippi543 U.S. 440Jan 24, 2005 · 543 U.S. 440Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Nike, Inc., et al. v. Marc Kasky539 U.S. 654Jun 26, 2003 · 539 U.S. 654Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Ford Motor Company and Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. v. John B. McCauley et al.537 U.S. 1Oct 15, 2002 · 537 U.S. 1Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Wanda Adams, et al. v. Florida Power Corporation and Florida Progress Corporation535 U.S. 228Apr 1, 2002 · 535 U.S. 228Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, et al.534 U.S. 103Nov 27, 2001 · 534 U.S. 103Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- District of Columbia, et al., v. Tri County Industries, Inc.531 U.S. 287Jan 17, 2001 · 531 U.S. 287Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Randall Ricci v. Village of Arlington Heights523 U.S. 613May 4, 1998 · 523 U.S. 613Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- George G. Rogers v. United States522 U.S. 252Jan 14, 1998 · 522 U.S. 252Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Guy E. Adams, et al. v. Charlie Frank Robertson and Liberty National Life Insurance Company520 U.S. 83Mar 3, 1997 · 520 U.S. 83Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Tom Grimmett, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Vincent Siragusa, and Joanne Siragusa v. Patricia L. Brown et al.519 U.S. 233Jan 14, 1997 · 519 U.S. 233Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Ticor Title Insurance Company, et al. v. Walter Thomas Brown and Jeffrey L. Dziewit511 U.S. 117Apr 4, 1994 · 511 U.S. 117Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Tennessee v. Donald Ray Middlebrooks510 U.S. 124Dec 13, 1993 · 510 U.S. 124Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Michael J. Cavanaugh, Executive Director, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, et al. v. Gary Lee Roller510 U.S. 42Nov 30, 1993 · 510 U.S. 42Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corporation, et al.510 U.S. 27Nov 30, 1993 · 510 U.S. 27Judicial power7–27–2 band
- Verl Hadley v. United States506 U.S. 19Nov 16, 1992 · 506 U.S. 19Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Montana v. Donald Glenn Imlay506 U.S. 5Nov 3, 1992 · 506 U.S. 5Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- PFZ Properties, Inc. v. Rene Alberto Rodriguez et al.503 U.S. 257Mar 9, 1992 · 503 U.S. 257Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Robert E. Gibson v. Florida Bar, et al.502 U.S. 104Dec 4, 1991 · 502 U.S. 104Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Ohio v. Ediberto Huertas498 U.S. 336Jan 22, 1991 · 498 U.S. 336Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- James M. White, etc. v. United States et al.493 U.S. 5Oct 16, 1989 · 493 U.S. 5Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Harbison-Walker Refractories, a Division of Dresser Industries, Inc., Pettioner v. Brieck, Eugene F.488 U.S. 226Dec 12, 1988 · 488 U.S. 226Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States Postal Service v. National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO485 U.S. 680Apr 27, 1988 · 485 U.S. 680Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Vermont v. Cox484 U.S. 173Dec 14, 1987 · 484 U.S. 173Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- John R. Van Drasek v. James H. Webb, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, et al.481 U.S. 738May 18, 1987 · 481 U.S. 738Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Petty480 U.S. 699Mar 24, 1987 · 480 U.S. 699Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Missouri v. Blair480 U.S. 698Mar 24, 1987 · 480 U.S. 698Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Merchant480 U.S. 615Mar 24, 1987 · 480 U.S. 615Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Cerbone, Justice of the Village Court, Village of Mt. Kisco, New York, et al. v. Conway479 U.S. 84Nov 17, 1986 · 479 U.S. 84Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Federal Labor Relations Authority et al.476 U.S. 19Apr 29, 1986 · 476 U.S. 19Judicial power7–27–2 band
- United States v. Quinn475 U.S. 791Apr 21, 1986 · 475 U.S. 791Judicial power7–27–2 band
- New York v. Uplinger et al.467 U.S. 246May 30, 1984 · 467 U.S. 246Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Vaughn et al.466 U.S. 521Apr 30, 1984 · 466 U.S. 521Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Finley, Clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois v. Murray456 U.S. 604May 17, 1982 · 456 U.S. 604Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware v. Kassel et al.455 U.S. 329Feb 23, 1982 · 455 U.S. 329Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Massachusetts v. Meehan445 U.S. 39Feb 26, 1980 · 445 U.S. 39Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Estes et al. v. Metropolitan Branches of the Dallas NAACP et al.444 U.S. 437Jan 21, 1980 · 444 U.S. 437Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Ramsey v. New York440 U.S. 444Mar 5, 1979 · 440 U.S. 444Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hunter v. Dean, Sheriff439 U.S. 281Dec 11, 1978 · 439 U.S. 281Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- McAdams, Executor, et al. v. McSurely et ux.438 U.S. 189Jun 26, 1978 · 438 U.S. 189Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- United States v. Jacobs, aka 'Mrs. Kramer'436 U.S. 31May 1, 1978 · 436 U.S. 31Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Jones v. Hildebrant et al.432 U.S. 183Jun 16, 1977 · 432 U.S. 183Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Maness v. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida430 U.S. 550Mar 29, 1977 · 430 U.S. 550Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Cook et al. v. Hudson et al.429 U.S. 165Dec 7, 1976 · 429 U.S. 165Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Belcher v. Stengel et al.429 U.S. 118Nov 30, 1976 · 429 U.S. 118Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Burrell et al. v. McCray et al.426 U.S. 471Jun 14, 1976 · 426 U.S. 471Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Drew Municipal Separate School District et al. v. Andrews et al.425 U.S. 559May 3, 1976 · 425 U.S. 559Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Quinn, Commissioner, Chicago Fire Department v. Muscare425 U.S. 560May 3, 1976 · 425 U.S. 560Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Cassius v. Arizona420 U.S. 514Mar 3, 1975 · 420 U.S. 514Judicial power6–27–2 band
- United States v. Guana-Sanchez420 U.S. 513Mar 3, 1975 · 420 U.S. 513Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Roe et al. v. Doe420 U.S. 307Feb 19, 1975 · 420 U.S. 307Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Holder, U.S. District Judge v. Banks417 U.S. 187May 28, 1974 · 417 U.S. 187Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Morris v. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare410 U.S. 422Feb 22, 1973 · 410 U.S. 422Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Murel et al. v. Baltimore City Criminal Court et al.407 U.S. 355Jun 19, 1972 · 407 U.S. 355Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. Thompson et al.405 U.S. 228Feb 29, 1972 · 405 U.S. 228Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Bostic v. United States402 U.S. 547May 24, 1971 · 402 U.S. 547Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Triangle Improvement Council et al. v. Ritchie, Commissioner, State Road Commission of West Virginia, et al.402 U.S. 497May 17, 1971 · 402 U.S. 497Judicial power5–0Unanimous band
- Bruno v. Pennsylvania400 U.S. 350Jan 12, 1971 · 400 U.S. 350Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hester v. Illinois397 U.S. 660Apr 27, 1970 · 397 U.S. 660Judicial power5–36–3 band
- Conway v. California Adult Authority et al.396 U.S. 107Dec 8, 1969 · 396 U.S. 107Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Perez v. California.395 U.S. 208May 26, 1969 · 395 U.S. 208Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Palmieri v. Florida393 U.S. 218Dec 9, 1968 · 393 U.S. 218Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hanner v. Demarcus et ux.390 U.S. 736Apr 29, 1968 · 390 U.S. 736Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Umans v. United States389 U.S. 80Nov 6, 1967 · 389 U.S. 80Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Heider, Administrator v. Michigan Sugar Co.385 U.S. 362Dec 12, 1966 · 385 U.S. 362Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Holt et al. v. Alleghany Corp. et al.384 U.S. 28Apr 18, 1966 · 384 U.S. 28Judicial power4–36–3 band
- Susser et al. v. Carvel Corp. et al.381 U.S. 125May 3, 1965 · 381 U.S. 125Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., et al.380 U.S. 249Mar 8, 1965 · 380 U.S. 249Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hughes Tool Co. et al. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.380 U.S. 248Mar 8, 1965 · 380 U.S. 248Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. United Air Lines, Inc.379 U.S. 26Nov 9, 1964 · 379 U.S. 26Judicial power7–18–1 band
- Dresner et al. v. City of Tallahassee.378 U.S. 539Jun 22, 1964 · 378 U.S. 539Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Diamond v. Louisiana.376 U.S. 201Feb 24, 1964 · 376 U.S. 201Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Smith v. Mississippi373 U.S. 238May 13, 1963 · 373 U.S. 238Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- In re Zipkin.369 U.S. 400Apr 2, 1962 · 369 U.S. 400Judicial power6–27–2 band
- Baldonado v. California366 U.S. 417May 22, 1961 · 366 U.S. 417Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Binks Manufacturing Co. v. Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp.366 U.S. 211May 8, 1961 · 366 U.S. 211Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Atchley v. California.366 U.S. 207May 1, 1961 · 366 U.S. 207Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Bullock v. South Carolina365 U.S. 292Feb 20, 1961 · 365 U.S. 292Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Kimbrough v. United States364 U.S. 661Jan 16, 1961 · 364 U.S. 661Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Needelman v. United States362 U.S. 600May 16, 1960 · 362 U.S. 600Judicial power6–36–3 band
- Phillips v. New York362 U.S. 456Apr 25, 1960 · 362 U.S. 456Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- McGann v. United States362 U.S. 214Mar 21, 1960 · 362 U.S. 214Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, v. Oregon Frozen Foods Co. et al.361 U.S. 231Jan 11, 1960 · 361 U.S. 231Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Joseph et al. v. Indiana.359 U.S. 117Mar 23, 1959 · 359 U.S. 117Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Hinkle, Administratrix, et al. v. New England Mutual Insurance Company of Boston, Massachusetts358 U.S. 65Nov 10, 1958 · 358 U.S. 65Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Triplett v. Iowa.357 U.S. 217Jun 16, 1958 · 357 U.S. 217Judicial power9–0Unanimous band
- Reeves v. Alabama.355 U.S. 368Jan 13, 1958 · 355 U.S. 368Judicial power8–18–1 band
- Ellis v. Dixon et al., Members of the Board of Education of the City of Yonkers349 U.S. 458Jun 6, 1955 · 349 U.S. 458Judicial power5–45–4 band
- Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc. et al.349 U.S. 70May 9, 1955 · 349 U.S. 70Judicial power5–36–3 band
- California ex rel. Brown, Attorney General, et al. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.348 U.S. 932Feb 7, 1955 · 348 U.S. 932Judicial power8–0Unanimous band
- Stembridge v. Georgia343 U.S. 541May 26, 1952 · 343 U.S. 541Judicial power6–36–3 band
Data notes
Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.
Official record
Read the full opinion on Justia and the argument audio on Oyez. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.