InsideGov
Supreme Court · Decisions

Fleischmann Distilling Corp. et al. v. Maier Brewing Co. et al.

386 U.S. 714 · No. 214 · 1966 term · Warren Court

Decided May 8, 1967 · argued Feb 14, 1967

Attorneys · Attorneys' and governmental employees' or officials' fees or compensation or licenses

Majority opinion: Earl Warren

The voteMajorityDissent

8–18 in the majority, 1 in dissent

1 dissent (8–1)

Affirmed. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. et al. lost.

What this ruling means

Affirmed: the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, so it stands (sometimes with changes the Court made to it).

Fleischmann Distilling Corp. et al. was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Lost” means the Court did not give that side the result it asked for.

From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.

Report a correction

Summary

The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.

Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.

Data notes

The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.

Report a correction

How the justices voted

Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1966 term. Filled: the 8 in the majority. Hollow: the 1 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.

More liberalMore conservativeMedianDouglasFortasWarrenBrennanBlackWhiteClarkStewartHarlan

Majority(8)

Dissent(1)

Data notes

Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.

Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.

Report a correction

The parties

Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.

Petitioner
Fleischmann Distilling Corp. et al.Inventor, patent assigner, trademark owner or holder
Respondent
Maier Brewing Co. et al.Brewery, distillery
Reached the Court by
Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
Why it was taken
Federal appeals courts had ruled differently on the question
Data notes

The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.

Report a correction

The law at issue

The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.

Provision
15 U.S.C. § 1117
Kind of law
Infrequently litigated statutes
Decided by
Statutory construction
Data notes

The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.

Report a correction

Timeline

What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.

  1. May 8, 1967DecidedDecided · Decided 8–1: affirmed. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. et al. lost.
  2. Feb 14, 1967ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
  3. Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari). Federal appeals courts had ruled differently on the question.
  4. Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit: reversed.
  5. Not datedBeganBegan · The case began in the California Northern U.S. District Court.
Data notes

From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.

Report a correction

Other decisions on the same issue

72 other argued cases since 1946 on attorneys' and governmental employees' or officials' fees or compensation or licenses, newest first.

  1. Lackey v. Stinnie145 S. Ct. 659Feb 25, 2025 · 145 S. Ct. 659Attorneys7–27–2 band

  2. Peter v. Nantkwest Inc.140 S. Ct. 365Dec 11, 2019 · 140 S. Ct. 365Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  3. Culbertson v. Berryhill139 S. Ct. 517Jan 8, 2019 · 139 S. Ct. 517Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  4. Murphy v. Smith138 S. Ct. 784Feb 21, 2018 · 138 S. Ct. 784Attorneys5–45–4 band

  5. Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.579 U.S. 197Jun 16, 2016 · 579 U.S. 197Attorneys8–0Unanimous band

  6. Baker Botts, L.L.P., v. ASARCO, L.L.C.576 U.S. 121Jun 15, 2015 · 576 U.S. 121Attorneys6–36–3 band

  7. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Mgmt. Sys.572 U.S. 559Apr 29, 2014 · 572 U.S. 559Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  8. Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.572 U.S. 545Apr 29, 2014 · 572 U.S. 545Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  9. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Petitioner v. Melissa Cloer569 U.S. 369May 20, 2013 · 569 U.S. 369Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  10. Ricky D Fox, Petitioner v. Judy Ann Vice, As Executrix of the Estate of Vice, et al.563 U.S. 826Jun 6, 2011 · 563 U.S. 826Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  11. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security v. Catherine G. Ratliff560 U.S. 586Jun 14, 2010 · 560 U.S. 586Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  12. Bridget Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company560 U.S. 242May 24, 2010 · 560 U.S. 242Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  13. Sonny Perdue, Governor of Georgia, et al. v. Kenny A., by His Next Friend Linda Winn, et al.559 U.S. 542Apr 21, 2010 · 559 U.S. 542Attorneys5–45–4 band

  14. Richlin Security Service Company v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security553 U.S. 571Jun 2, 2008 · 553 U.S. 571Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  15. Michael W. Sole, Secretary, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, et al. v. T. A. Wyner, et al.551 U.S. 74Jun 4, 2007 · 551 U.S. 74Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  16. Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company549 U.S. 443Mar 20, 2007 · 549 U.S. 443Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  17. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Pearl Murphy et vir548 U.S. 291Jun 26, 2006 · 548 U.S. 291Attorneys6–36–3 band

  18. Gerald T. Martin, et ux. v. Franklin Capital Corporation et al.546 U.S. 132Dec 7, 2005 · 546 U.S. 132Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  19. Randall C. Scarborough v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs541 U.S. 401May 3, 2004 · 541 U.S. 401Attorneys7–27–2 band
  20. John M. Lamie v. United States Trustee540 U.S. 526Jan 26, 2004 · 540 U.S. 526Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  21. Gary E. Gisbrecht, Barbara A. Miller, and Nancy Sandine v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security535 U.S. 789May 28, 2002 · 535 U.S. 789Attorneys8–18–1 band
  22. Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc., et al. v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al.532 U.S. 598May 29, 2001 · 532 U.S. 598Attorneys5–45–4 band

  23. Bill Martin, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, et al. v. Everett Hadix et al.527 U.S. 343Jun 21, 1999 · 527 U.S. 343Attorneys7–27–2 band
  24. John C. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.510 U.S. 517Mar 1, 1994 · 510 U.S. 517Attorneys9–0Unanimous band

  25. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Richard H. Schaefer509 U.S. 292Jun 24, 1993 · 509 U.S. 292Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  26. Dale Farrar and Pat Smith, Co-Administrators of Estate of Joseph D. Farrar, Deceased v. William P. Hobby, Jr.506 U.S. 103Dec 14, 1992 · 506 U.S. 103Attorneys5–45–4 band
  27. City of Burlington v. Ernest Dague, Sr., et al.505 U.S. 557Jun 24, 1992 · 505 U.S. 557Attorneys6–36–3 band
  28. Rafeh-Rafie Ardestani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service502 U.S. 129Dec 10, 1991 · 502 U.S. 129Attorneys6–27–2 band
  29. Kay v. Ehrler et al.499 U.S. 432Apr 16, 1991 · 499 U.S. 432Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  30. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Robert Casey, Governor of Pennsylvania, et al.499 U.S. 83Mar 19, 1991 · 499 U.S. 83Attorneys6–36–3 band
  31. Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al. v. Marie Lucie Jean, et al.496 U.S. 154Jun 4, 1990 · 496 U.S. 154Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  32. Venegas v. Mitchell495 U.S. 82Apr 18, 1990 · 495 U.S. 82Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  33. United States Department of Labor v. Triplett et al.494 U.S. 715Mar 27, 1990 · 494 U.S. 715Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  34. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes et al.491 U.S. 754Jun 22, 1989 · 491 U.S. 754Attorneys6–27–2 band
  35. Missouri et al. v. Jenkins, by Her Friend, Agyei, et al.491 U.S. 274Jun 19, 1989 · 491 U.S. 274Attorneys5–36–3 band
  36. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Hudson490 U.S. 877Jun 12, 1989 · 490 U.S. 877Attorneys5–45–4 band
  37. Texas State Teachers Association et al. v. Garland Independent School District et al.489 U.S. 782Mar 28, 1989 · 489 U.S. 782Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  38. Blanchard v. Bergeron et al.489 U.S. 87Feb 21, 1989 · 489 U.S. 87Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  39. Pierce, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Underwood et al.487 U.S. 552Jun 27, 1988 · 487 U.S. 552Attorneys6–27–2 band
  40. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Mary Alice Galbreath485 U.S. 74Feb 24, 1988 · 485 U.S. 74Attorneys8–0Unanimous band
  41. Pennsylvania et al. v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air et al.483 U.S. 711Jun 26, 1987 · 483 U.S. 711Attorneys5–45–4 band
  42. Hewitt et al. v. Helms482 U.S. 755Jun 19, 1987 · 482 U.S. 755Attorneys5–45–4 band
  43. North Carolina Department of Transportation et al. v. Crest Street Community Council, Inc., et al.479 U.S. 6Nov 4, 1986 · 479 U.S. 6Attorneys6–36–3 band
  44. Pennsylvania et al. v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air et al.478 U.S. 546Jul 2, 1986 · 478 U.S. 546Attorneys6–36–3 band
  45. Library of Congress et al. v. Shaw478 U.S. 310Jul 1, 1986 · 478 U.S. 310Attorneys6–36–3 band
  46. City of Riverside et al. v. Rivera et al.477 U.S. 561Jun 27, 1986 · 477 U.S. 561Attorneys5–45–4 band
  47. Evans, Governor of Idaho, et al. v. Jeff D. et al., Minors, by and Through Their Next Friend, Johnson, et al.475 U.S. 717Apr 21, 1986 · 475 U.S. 717Attorneys6–36–3 band
  48. Walters, Administrator of Veterans' Affairs, et al. v. National Association of Radiation Survivors et al.473 U.S. 305Jun 28, 1985 · 473 U.S. 305Attorneys6–36–3 band
  49. Kentucky, dba Bureau of State Police v. Graham et al.473 U.S. 159Jun 28, 1985 · 473 U.S. 159Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  50. Marek et al. v. Chesny, Individually, and As Administrator of the Estate of Chesny473 U.S. 1Jun 27, 1985 · 473 U.S. 1Attorneys6–36–3 band
  51. Webb v. County Board of Education of Dyer County, Tennessee, et al.471 U.S. 234Apr 17, 1985 · 471 U.S. 234Attorneys6–27–2 band
  52. Roger L. Spencer, et ux. v. South Carolina Tax Commission et al.471 U.S. 82Mar 27, 1985 · 471 U.S. 82Attorneys4–45–4 band
  53. Smith et al. v. Robinson, Rhode Island Associate Commissioner of Education, et al.468 U.S. 992Jul 5, 1984 · 468 U.S. 992Attorneys6–36–3 band
  54. Blum, Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services v. Stenson465 U.S. 886Mar 21, 1984 · 465 U.S. 886Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  55. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency v. Sierra Club et al.463 U.S. 680Jul 1, 1983 · 463 U.S. 680Attorneys5–45–4 band
  56. Hensley et al. v. Eckerhart et al.461 U.S. 424May 16, 1983 · 461 U.S. 424Attorneys5–45–4 band
  57. Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Local 112, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America456 U.S. 717Jun 1, 1982 · 456 U.S. 717Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  58. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security et al.455 U.S. 445Mar 2, 1982 · 455 U.S. 445Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  59. Maher, Commissioner of Income Maintenance of Connecticut v. Gagne448 U.S. 122Jun 25, 1980 · 448 U.S. 122Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  60. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper et al.447 U.S. 752Jun 23, 1980 · 447 U.S. 752Attorneys9–0Unanimous band
  61. New York Gaslight Club, Inc., et al. v. Carey447 U.S. 54Jun 9, 1980 · 447 U.S. 54Attorneys7–27–2 band
  62. Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert et al.444 U.S. 472Feb 19, 1980 · 444 U.S. 472Attorneys8–18–1 band
  63. Hutto et al. v. Finney et al.Landmark437 U.S. 678Jun 23, 1978 · 437 U.S. 678Attorneys5–45–4 band
  64. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission434 U.S. 412Jan 23, 1978 · 434 U.S. 412Attorneys8–0Unanimous band

  65. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society et al.421 U.S. 240May 12, 1975 · 421 U.S. 240Attorneys5–27–2 band

  66. F. D. Rich Co., Inc., et al. v. United States for the Use of Industrial Lumber Co., Inc.417 U.S. 116May 28, 1974 · 417 U.S. 116Attorneys8–18–1 band
  67. Bradley et al. v. School Board of the City of Richmond et al.416 U.S. 696May 15, 1974 · 416 U.S. 696Attorneys7–0Unanimous band
  68. Hall et al. v. Cole412 U.S. 1May 21, 1973 · 412 U.S. 1Attorneys6–27–2 band
  69. Mills et al. v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. et al.396 U.S. 375Jan 20, 1970 · 396 U.S. 375Attorneys7–18–1 band
  70. Hopkins v. Cohen, Acting Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare390 U.S. 530Apr 2, 1968 · 390 U.S. 530Attorneys5–36–3 band
  71. Newman et al. v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., et al.390 U.S. 400Mar 18, 1968 · 390 U.S. 400Attorneys8–0Unanimous band

  72. United States v. R. F. Ball Construction Co., Inc., et al.355 U.S. 587Mar 3, 1958 · 355 U.S. 587Attorneys5–45–4 band
Data notes

Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.

Report a correction

Official record

Read the full opinion on Justia and the argument audio on Oyez. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.