InsideGov
Supreme Court · Decisions

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation et al.

349 U.S. 44 · No. 191 · 1954 term · Warren Court

Decided Apr 11, 1955 · argued Mar 28, 1955

Economic activity · Federal and some few state regulation of public utilities regulation: gas producer

The voteMajorityDissent

7–17 in the majority, 1 in dissent

1 dissent (8–1)

Reversed. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. won.

What this ruling means

Reversed: the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, and its own ruling ends the case.

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Won” means the Court gave that side the result it asked for.

From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.

Report a correction

Summary

The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.

Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.

Data notes

The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.

Report a correction

How the justices voted

Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1954 term. Filled: the 7 in the majority. Hollow: the 1 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.

More liberalMore conservativeMedianDouglasBlackWarrenClarkFrankfurterMintonBurtonReed

Majority(7)

Dissent(1)

Did not take part: John Harlan.

Data notes

Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.

Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.

Report a correction

The parties

Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.

Petitioner
Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Pipe line company
Respondent
Panoma Corporation et al.Oil company, or natural gas producer
Reached the Court by
Appeal (the Court was required to hear it)
Data notes

The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.

Report a correction

The law at issue

The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.

Decided by
Federal common law
Data notes

The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.

Report a correction

Timeline

What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.

  1. Apr 11, 1955DecidedDecided · Decided 7–1: reversed. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. won.
  2. Mar 28, 1955ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
  3. Not datedTaken upTaken up · Reached the Supreme Court on appeal, which the Court had to hear.
  4. Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Began in and was decided by the Oklahoma Supreme Court: affirmed, with a dissent.
Data notes

From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.

Report a correction

Other decisions on the same issue

25 other argued cases since 1946 on federal and some few state regulation of public utilities regulation: gas producer, newest first.

  1. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Martin Exploration Management Co. et al.486 U.S. 204May 31, 1988 · 486 U.S. 204Economic activity8–0Unanimous band
  2. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Shell Oil Co. et al.440 U.S. 192Feb 22, 1979 · 440 U.S. 192Economic activity4–45–4 band
  3. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co. et al.439 U.S. 508Jan 16, 1979 · 439 U.S. 508Economic activity7–0Unanimous band
  4. California et al. v. Southland Royalty Co. et al.436 U.S. 519May 31, 1978 · 436 U.S. 519Economic activity4–36–3 band
  5. Federal Power Commission v. Moss et al.424 U.S. 494Mar 3, 1976 · 424 U.S. 494Economic activity6–0Unanimous band
  6. Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.417 U.S. 380Jun 10, 1974 · 417 U.S. 380Economic activity8–0Unanimous band
  7. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al.417 U.S. 283Jun 10, 1974 · 417 U.S. 283Economic activity7–0Unanimous band
  8. Federal Power Commission v. Sunray DX Oil Co. et al.391 U.S. 9May 6, 1968 · 391 U.S. 9Economic activity8–0Unanimous band
  9. Continental Oil Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission390 U.S. 747May 1, 1968 · 390 U.S. 747Economic activity7–18–1 band
  10. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.385 U.S. 83Nov 14, 1966 · 385 U.S. 83Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
  11. United Gas Improvement Co. et al. v. Callery Properties, Inc., et al.382 U.S. 223Dec 7, 1965 · 382 U.S. 223Economic activity7–18–1 band
  12. Federal Power Commission v. Hunt et al.376 U.S. 515Mar 30, 1964 · 376 U.S. 515Economic activity7–27–2 band
  13. Wisconsin et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.373 U.S. 294May 20, 1963 · 373 U.S. 294Economic activity5–45–4 band
  14. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Delaware for New Castle County et al.366 U.S. 656May 29, 1961 · 366 U.S. 656Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
  15. Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission364 U.S. 170Jun 27, 1960 · 364 U.S. 170Economic activity5–45–4 band
  16. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission364 U.S. 137Jun 27, 1960 · 364 U.S. 137Economic activity5–45–4 band
  17. Atlantic Refining Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission of New York et al.360 U.S. 378Jun 22, 1959 · 360 U.S. 378Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
  18. Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas et al.355 U.S. 391Jan 20, 1958 · 355 U.S. 391Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
  19. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Louisiana Public Service Commission et al.353 U.S. 368May 13, 1957 · 353 U.S. 368Economic activity8–0Unanimous band
  20. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp. et al.350 U.S. 332Feb 27, 1956 · 350 U.S. 332Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
  21. Federal Power Commission v. Colorado Interstate Gas Co.348 U.S. 492Mar 28, 1955 · 348 U.S. 492Economic activity8–0Unanimous band
  22. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin et al.347 U.S. 672Jun 7, 1954 · 347 U.S. 672Economic activity5–36–3 band

  23. Federal Power Commission v. East Ohio Gas Co. et al.338 U.S. 464Jan 9, 1950 · 338 U.S. 464Economic activity5–27–2 band
  24. Federal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. et al.337 U.S. 498Jun 20, 1949 · 337 U.S. 498Economic activity5–36–3 band
  25. Interstate Natural Gas Co., Inc. v. Federal Power Commission et al.331 U.S. 682Jun 16, 1947 · 331 U.S. 682Economic activity9–0Unanimous band
Data notes

Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.

Report a correction

Official record

Read the full opinion on Justia. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.