Taylor v. Alabama

The court held that a Pennsylvania law is consistent with Due Process.

The Court held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), a statute defining certain "aggravated felonies" for immigration purposes, is unconstitutionally vague.

The Court held that a taxpayer who wants to question Internal Revenue Service agents about their motives for issuing a summons may do so if they can point to "specific facts or circumstances plausibly raising an inference of bad faith."

The Court ruled, 5-3, that after a mailed notice was returned unclaimed, a state was required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to take additional reasonable steps to notify the owner before the sale could proceed.

The Court recognized the power of the U.S. government to detain enemy combatants, including U.S. citizens, but ruled that detainees who are U.S. citizens must have the rights of due process, and the ability to challenge their enemy combatant status before an impartial authority.

The court held that to afford due-process notice, the government must attempt to provide actual notice, but it is not required to succeed in providing actual notice.

The Court held that there was no due process violation for lack of fair warning when courts broadened pre-existing common law limitations on what acts constitute a crime under a more broadly worded statute to include additional acts.· AI-written

The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court.

The court held that due process requires a party to be given an opportunity to respond and contest their personal liability for a fee award after being made a party and before the entry of a judgment against them.

The Court held that the petitioner was entitled to have his discrimination complaint adjudged by Illinois's Fair Employment Practices Commission (FEPC), which had dismissed it for its own failure to meet a deadline.

The Court held that a public school must conduct a hearing before subjecting a student to suspension.

The Court held that extensive state regulation of a public utility does not transform its acts into state action that is reviewable by a federal court under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The court held that failure to provide notice of pending adoption proceedings to the adversely situated biological parent is a violation of due process.

The court held that due process does not require advance notice that the trial on the substantive offense will be followed by a habitual criminal accusation, but it does require a reasonable opportunity to defend against such an accusation.

The court held that when one is required to register one's presence, failure to register may be punished only when there is a probability that the accused party had knowledge of the law before committing the crime of failing to register.

The Court upheld the prolonged immigration detention of an alien who, on confidential information and without a hearing, was denied admission to the United States.

The Court held that a lawful permanent resident, who departs from and returns to the country as a seaman on an American ship, retains procedural due process rights and cannot be deported under 8 CFR § 175.57(b) without a hearing.