InsideGov
Congress · Laws

National Cooperative Research Act of 1984

Public Law 98-462 · S. 1841 · 98th Congress · began in the Senate

Signed by Ronald Reagan (R) on Oct 11, 1984 · Commerce

Sponsor: Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-SC)

Cosponsors (68): Sen. Pete Wilson,

Passage votes

  • HouseVoice vote
  • SenateVoice vote
Data notes

The final version of the law, as each chamber passed it. A chamber that passed it by voice vote or unanimous consent has no count. “Method not stated” means the record does not say how the chamber voted. Where the record has a member-by-member vote, the “Who voted for it” section shows who voted yea.

Report a correction

Summary

The Congressional Research Service’s plain-language summary of what the law does.

National Cooperative Research Act of 1984 - Provides that a person's conduct in making or performing a contract to carry out a joint research and development venture shall not be deemed illegal per se under Federal antitrust laws or similar State laws but shall be judged on its reasonableness considering factors including its effect on competition in the relevant markets.

Excludes from the definition of the term "joint research and development venture" any activity in which two or more participating parties: (1) exchange information regarding the costs, sales, profitability, prices, marketing, or distribution of any product, process, or service that is not required to conduct the research and development under such venture; (2) restrict or require the production or marketing by any party of any product, process, or service other than proprietary information developed through such venture; or (3) restrict or require other research and development activities, or the sale, licensing, or sharing of any invention or development not developed through such venture, if such a restriction or requirement is not required to prevent misappropriation of proprietary information contributed by any participant or of the results of such venture.

Limits to actual damages, specified interest thereon, and the cost of suit the amount that any person or State may recover on a claim in an antitrust action under State or Federal law if the claim is: (1) based on conduct under a joint research and development venture that is described in a venture notification filed with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC); and (2) filed after such notification becomes effective. Provides that such recovery limitation shall not apply to any conduct in violation of a court order or decree issued after enactment of this Act in any State or Federal antitrust action challenging such conduct as part of such a venture. Directs the court to award the cost of litigating such a claim, including reasonable attorney fees, to: (1) a substantially prevailing claimant; or (2) a substantially prevailing defendent if the claimant's conduct during the litigation was frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith. Authorizes such an award to be offset by an award in favor of any other party for any part of the cost of litigation attributable to conduct during the litigation by any prevailing party that the court finds to be frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith.

Permits any party to a joint research and development venture, in order to qualify for such limited recovery protection, to file with the Attorney General and the FTC within a specified period a notification disclosing the parties to such venture and the nature and objectiveness of the venture. Requires the venture to file a notification of any change of membership within 90 days after such change. Directs the Attorney General or the FTC, within 30 days after receiving such notification, to publish in the Federal Register a notice identifying the parties to such venture and the area of planned activity of such venture. Provides that such a notification shall be effective as of the earlier of: (1) the date of expiration of such 30-day period, provided the notice is published eventually; or (2) the date the notice is published.

Exempts from public disclosure all material submitted as part of such a notification and all information obtained by the Attorney General or the FTC in any investigation, administrative proceeding, or case concerning an antitrust violation by a venture for which such a notification was filed.

Committees

The committees the bill was sent to, and what each did with it.

  • Judiciary Committee · Senate · hearings by (full committee), markup by, referred to, reported bySubcommittee: Intellectual Property Subcommittee
Data notes

A committee links to its page only where it exists in the current Congress; older and renamed committees are named without a link.

Report a correction

Timeline

From introduction to signing, newest first: the committees, the floor and the president. 26 actions.

  1. Oct 11, 1984Became lawBecame law · Became Public Law No: 98-462.
  2. Became lawBecame law · Signed by President.
  3. Oct 3, 1984PresidentPresident · Presented to President.
  4. Oct 1, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · House Agreed to Conference Report by Voice Vote.
  5. Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conference report agreed to in House: House Agreed to Conference Report by Voice Vote.
  6. Sep 26, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · Senate agreed to conference report by Voice Vote.
  7. Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conference report agreed to in Senate: Senate agreed to conference report by Voice Vote.
  8. Sep 21, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conference Report 98-1044 Filed in House.
  9. Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conference report filed: Conference Report 98-1044 Filed in House.
  10. Sep 20, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conferees agreed to file conference report.
  11. Resolving differencesResolving differences · Conference committee actions: Conferees agreed to file conference report.
  12. Aug 10, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · Additional Conferee Gregg Appointed to the Conference Committee by the Speaker of the House.
  13. Aug 9, 1984Resolving differencesResolving differences · Senate agreed to request for conference. Appointed conferees. Thurmond; Mathias; Hatch; Dole; Biden; Metzenbaum; Leahy.
  14. Resolving differencesResolving differences · House Requested a Conference and Speaker Appointed Conferees: Rodino, Brooks, Edwards (CA), Seiberling, Hughes, Synar, Crockett, Schumer, Feighan, Fuqua, Fish, Moorhead, Hyde, Sawyer, Lungren.
  15. Resolving differencesResolving differences · House Insisted on its Amendments by Voice Vote.
  16. FloorFloor · Senate disagreed to the House amendments by Voice Vote.
  17. FloorFloor · Passed House (Amended) by Voice Vote.
  18. FloorFloor · Called up by House by Unanimous Consent.
  19. Jul 31, 1984FloorFloor · Passed Senate with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 97-0. Record Vote No: 209.Senate roll call 209
  20. FloorFloor · Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent.
  21. May 3, 1984CommitteeCommittee · Reported by Senate Judiciary Committee
  22. Apr 3, 1984CommitteeCommittee · Hearings by Intellectual Property Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee
  23. Mar 22, 1984CommitteeCommittee · Markup by Senate Judiciary Committee
  24. Mar 12, 1984CommitteeCommittee · Hearings by Senate Judiciary Committee
  25. Sep 14, 1983CommitteeCommittee · Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee
  26. IntroducedIntroduced · Introduced in the Senate
Data notes

Shows the introduction, each committee and subcommittee step the source dates (referral, hearings, markup, report, discharge), and the floor, conference, presidential and became-law steps. Calendar placements, messages between the chambers, amendments and committee report numbers are not shown for laws before the 108th Congress. Two entries the source lists twice are shown once.

Report a correction

Official record

The bill’s full text and every action, including introduction and committee steps, are on Congress.gov. Data through Oct 7, 2026.