Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act
Public Law 93-528 · S. 782 · 93rd Congress · began in the Senate
Signed by Gerald Ford (R) on Dec 21, 1974 · Commerce
Sponsor: Sen. John Tunney (D-CA)
Cosponsors (4): Sen. Edward Gurney, Sen. Birch Bayh,
Passage votes
- HouseMethod not stated
- SenateMethod not stated
Data notes
The final version of the law, as each chamber passed it. A chamber that passed it by voice vote or unanimous consent has no count. “Method not stated” means the record does not say how the chamber voted. Where the record has a member-by-member vote, the “Who voted for it” section shows who voted yea.
Summary
The Congressional Research Service’s plain-language summary of what the law does.
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act - Provides that any consent decree proposed by the United States must be filed with the court in which the case is pending and simultaneously published in the Federal Register at least sixty days prior to the effective date of the decree. States that simultaneously with such filing the Government must file a "competitive impact statement" containing the following: (1) the nature and purpose of the proceeding; (2) a description of the practices or events giving rise to the alleged violation of the antitrust laws; (3) an explanation of the proposed judgment, the relief to be obtained thereby, the anticipated effects on competition of that relief and an explanation of any special circumstances giving rise to the proposed judgment or any provisions contained therein; (4) the remedies available to potential private plaintiffs damaged by the alleged violation in the event that the judgment is entered; (5) a description of the procedures available for modification of the judgment; and (6) a description and evaluation of alternatives actually considered to the proposed judgment and the anticipated effects on competition of such alternatives.
Lengthens the present thirty-day public comment period to sixty days. Provides that the sixty-day period may be shortened by order of court but only upon a showing that extraordinary circumstances require it and that such a shortened time period would not be adverse to the public interest.
Provides that the court shall make a determination on whether the entry of a proposed consent judgment is in the public interest as defined by law. Lists the following criteria to assist the court in making a determination: (1) the public impact of the judgment, including the termination of alleged violations, provisions for enforcement and modification, duration of relief sought, anticipated effects of alternative remedies actually considered, and any other considerations bearing upon the adequacy of judgment; and (2) the public impact of entry of the judgment upon the public generally and persons alleging specific injury from the violations set forth in the complaint, including the consideration of the public benefits to be derived from a determination of the issues at trial.
Provides that not later than ten days following the filing of any proposed consent judgment as required by this Act each defendant must file with the district court a description of any and all oral communications by or on behalf of the defendant with any officer or employee of the United States concerning or relevant to the consent judgment or the subject matter thereof.
Provides that proceedings before the district court in connection with the decree pursuant to this Act and public impact statements filed pursuant to the Act are not admissible against any defendant in any action or proceeding brought by any other party against that defendant under the antitrust laws or by the United States under Section 4A of the Clayton Act, nor do they constitute a basis for introduction of the decree as prima facie evidence against such defendant in any such action or proceeding.
Increases the penalties for criminal violations of the antitrust laws from $50,000 to $100,000 for individuals and $1,000,000 for corporations.
Sets forth procedures for expediting antitrust cases which are of general public importance. Sets forth procedures for appeal to the Supreme Court of antitrust cases of general public importance.
Committees
The committees the bill was sent to, and what each did with it.
Data notes
A committee links to its page only where it exists in the current Congress; older and renamed committees are named without a link.
Timeline
From introduction to signing, newest first: the committees, the floor and the president. 13 actions.
- Dec 21, 1974Became lawBecame law · Signed by President.
- PresidentPresident · Public law 93-528.
- Dec 12, 1974PresidentPresident · Measure presented to President.
- Dec 11, 1974Resolving differencesResolving differences · House agreed to the Senate amendment to the House amendment.
- Dec 9, 1974Resolving differencesResolving differences · Senate agreed to House amendment with an amendment.
- Nov 19, 1974FloorFloor · Measure passed House, amended.
- Oct 11, 1974CommitteeCommittee · Reported by House Judiciary Committee
- Jul 23, 1973CommitteeCommittee · Referred to House Judiciary Committee
- Jul 19, 1973FloorFloor · Placed on calendar under motion to reconsider passage in Senate.
- Jul 18, 1973FloorFloor · Measure passed Senate, amended, roll call #302 (92-0).Senate roll call 302
- Jun 30, 1973CommitteeCommittee · Reported by Senate Judiciary Committee
- Feb 6, 1973CommitteeCommittee · Referred to Senate Judiciary Committee
- IntroducedIntroduced · Introduced in the Senate
Data notes
Shows the introduction, each committee and subcommittee step the source dates (referral, hearings, markup, report, discharge), and the floor, conference, presidential and became-law steps. Calendar placements, messages between the chambers, amendments and committee report numbers are not shown for laws before the 108th Congress. Two entries the source lists twice are shown once.
Official record
The bill’s full text and every action, including introduction and committee steps, are on Congress.gov. Data through Oct 7, 2026.