InsideGov
Supreme Court · Decisions

Thomas F. Conroy v. Walter Aniskoff, Jr., et al.

507 U.S. 511 · No. 91-1353 · 1992 term · Rehnquist Court

Decided Mar 31, 1993 · argued Jan 11, 1993

Civil rights · Military: active duty

Majority opinion: John Stevens

The voteMajority

9–09 in the majority, 0 in dissent

No dissent (9–0)

Reversed. Thomas F. Conroy won.

What this ruling means

Reversed: the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Maine Supreme Court, and its own ruling ends the case.

Thomas F. Conroy was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Won” means the Court gave that side the result it asked for.

From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.

Report a correction

Summary

The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.

Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.

Data notes

The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.

Report a correction

How the justices voted

Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1992 term. Filled: the 9 in the majority. Hollow: the 0 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.

More liberalMore conservativeMedianStevensBlackmunSouterWhiteO'ConnorKennedyRehnquistScaliaThomas

Majority(9)

Dissent(0)

  • None.
Data notes

Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.

Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.

Report a correction

The parties

Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.

Petitioner
Thomas F. ConroyMilitary personnel, or dependent
Respondent
Walter Aniskoff, Jr., et al.Owner, landlord, or claimant to ownership, fee interest, or possession of land as well as chattels
Reached the Court by
Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
Why it was taken
A federal court and a state court had ruled differently
Data notes

The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.

Report a correction

The law at issue

The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.

Provision
50 U.S.C. § 525
Kind of law
Infrequently litigated statutes
Decided by
Statutory construction
Data notes

The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.

Report a correction

Timeline

What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.

  1. Mar 31, 1993DecidedDecided · Decided 9–0: reversed. Thomas F. Conroy won.
  2. Jan 11, 1993ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
  3. Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari). A federal court and a state court had ruled differently.
  4. Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Decided by the Maine Supreme Court: affirmed, with a dissent.
  5. Not datedBeganBegan · The case began in the Maine trial court.
Data notes

From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.

Report a correction

Other decisions on the same issue

35 other argued cases since 1946 on military: active duty, newest first.

  1. Dalmazzi v. United States138 S. Ct. 2273Jun 22, 2018 · 138 S. Ct. 2273Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  2. Cox v. United States138 S. Ct. 2273Jun 22, 2018 · 138 S. Ct. 2273Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  3. Dwight J. Loving v. United States517 U.S. 748Jun 3, 1996 · 517 U.S. 748Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  4. James D. Ryder v. United States515 U.S. 177Jun 12, 1995 · 515 U.S. 177Civil rights9–0Unanimous band

  5. Eric J. Weiss v. United States510 U.S. 163Jan 19, 1994 · 510 U.S. 163Civil rights9–0Unanimous band

  6. William 'Sky' King v. St. Vincent's Hospital502 U.S. 215Dec 16, 1991 · 502 U.S. 215Civil rights8–0Unanimous band
  7. Solorio v. United States483 U.S. 435Jun 25, 1987 · 483 U.S. 435Civil rights6–36–3 band
  8. United States et al. v. Larionoff et al.431 U.S. 864Jun 13, 1977 · 431 U.S. 864Civil rights5–45–4 band
  9. McLucas, Secretary of the Air Force, et al. v. Dechamplain421 U.S. 21Apr 15, 1975 · 421 U.S. 21Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  10. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Councilman420 U.S. 738Mar 25, 1975 · 420 U.S. 738Civil rights6–36–3 band
  11. Schick v. Reed, Chairman, United States Board of Parole, et al.419 U.S. 256Dec 23, 1974 · 419 U.S. 256Civil rights6–36–3 band
  12. Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech418 U.S. 676Jul 8, 1974 · 418 U.S. 676Civil rights6–36–3 band
  13. Parker, Warden, et al. v. Levy417 U.S. 733Jun 19, 1974 · 417 U.S. 733Civil rights5–36–3 band
  14. Cass v. United States417 U.S. 72May 28, 1974 · 417 U.S. 72Civil rights8–18–1 band
  15. Relford v. Commandant, U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Ft. Leavenworth401 U.S. 355Feb 24, 1971 · 401 U.S. 355Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  16. O'Callahan v. Parker, Warden395 U.S. 258Jun 2, 1969 · 395 U.S. 258Civil rights5–36–3 band
  17. United States v. Augenblick et al.393 U.S. 348Jan 14, 1969 · 393 U.S. 348Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  18. Snapp v. Neal, State Auditor, et al.382 U.S. 397Jan 18, 1966 · 382 U.S. 397Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  19. California v. Buzard382 U.S. 386Jan 18, 1966 · 382 U.S. 386Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  20. McElroy, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. United States ex rel. Guagliardo361 U.S. 281Jan 18, 1960 · 361 U.S. 281Civil rights5–45–4 band
  21. Grisham v. Hagan, Warden361 U.S. 278Jan 18, 1960 · 361 U.S. 278Civil rights7–27–2 band
  22. Kinsella, Warden, v. United States ex rel. Singleton361 U.S. 234Jan 18, 1960 · 361 U.S. 234Civil rights7–27–2 band
  23. Lee v. Madigan, Warden358 U.S. 228Jan 12, 1959 · 358 U.S. 228Civil rights6–27–2 band
  24. Harmon v. Brucker, Secretary of the Army355 U.S. 579Mar 3, 1958 · 355 U.S. 579Civil rights8–18–1 band
  25. Wilson, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Girard354 U.S. 524Jul 11, 1957 · 354 U.S. 524Civil rights8–0Unanimous band

  26. Reid, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail, v. CovertLandmark · Other areas · Other354 U.S. 1Jun 10, 1957 · 354 U.S. 1Civil rights6–27–2 band

  27. Fowler v. Wilkinson, Warden353 U.S. 583Jun 3, 1957 · 353 U.S. 583Civil rights5–45–4 band
  28. Jackson v. Taylor, Acting Warden353 U.S. 569Jun 3, 1957 · 353 U.S. 569Civil rights5–45–4 band
  29. United States v. Brown348 U.S. 110Dec 6, 1954 · 348 U.S. 110Civil rights5–36–3 band
  30. Madsen v. Kinsella, Warden343 U.S. 341Apr 28, 1952 · 343 U.S. 341Civil rights8–18–1 band
  31. Woodward v. United States et al.341 U.S. 112Apr 23, 1951 · 341 U.S. 112Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  32. Robertson, President of the Army Review Board, v. Chambers341 U.S. 37Apr 9, 1951 · 341 U.S. 37Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  33. Hiatt, Warden, v. Brown339 U.S. 103Mar 13, 1950 · 339 U.S. 103Civil rights8–0Unanimous band
  34. Le Maistre v. Leffers et al.333 U.S. 1Feb 2, 1948 · 333 U.S. 1Civil rights9–0Unanimous band
  35. United States v. Bayer et al.331 U.S. 532Jun 9, 1947 · 331 U.S. 532Civil rights7–27–2 band
Data notes

Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.

Report a correction

Official record

Read the full opinion on Justia and the argument audio on Oyez. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.