InsideGov
Supreme Court · Decisions

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Taylor

481 U.S. 58 · No. 85-686 · 1986 term · Rehnquist Court

Decided Apr 6, 1987 · argued Jan 21, 1987

Federalism · Federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction

Majority opinion: Sandra O'Connor

The voteMajority

9–09 in the majority, 0 in dissent

No dissent (9–0)

Reversed. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. won.

What this ruling means

Reversed: the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, and its own ruling ends the case.

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Won” means the Court gave that side the result it asked for.

From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.

Report a correction

Summary

The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.

Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.

Data notes

The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.

Report a correction

How the justices voted

Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1986 term. Filled: the 9 in the majority. Hollow: the 0 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.

More liberalMore conservativeMedianMarshallBrennanBlackmunStevensPowellWhiteScaliaO'ConnorRehnquist

Majority(9)

Dissent(0)

  • None.
Data notes

Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.

Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.

Report a correction

The parties

Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.

Petitioner
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Employer-employee trust agreement, employee health and welfare fund, or multi-employer pension plan
Respondent
TaylorEmployee, or job applicant
Reached the Court by
Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
Why it was taken
Federal appeals courts had ruled differently on the question
Data notes

The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.

Report a correction

The law at issue

The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.

Provision
Employee Retirement Income Security, as amended
Kind of law
Federal Statute
Decided by
Statutory construction
Data notes

The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.

Report a correction

Timeline

What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.

  1. Apr 6, 1987DecidedDecided · Decided 9–0: reversed. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. won.
  2. Jan 21, 1987ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
  3. Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari). Federal appeals courts had ruled differently on the question.
  4. Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit: reversed.
  5. Not datedBeganBegan · The case began in the Michigan Eastern U.S. District Court.
Data notes

From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.

Report a correction

Other decisions on the same issue

81 other argued cases since 1946 on federal pre-emption of state court jurisdiction, newest first.

  1. Monsanto Company v. Durnell146 S. Ct. 2001Jun 25, 2026 · 146 S. Ct. 2001Federalism7–27–2 band

  2. Cruz v. Arizona598 U.S. 17Feb 22, 2023 · 598 U.S. 17Federalism5–45–4 band
  3. Oklahoma v. Castro-HuertaLandmark · Native American law142 S. Ct. 2486Jun 29, 2022 · 142 S. Ct. 2486Federalism5–45–4 band

  4. Howell v. Howell137 S. Ct. 1400May 15, 2017 · 137 S. Ct. 1400Federalism8–0Unanimous band

  5. Northwest, Inc. v. Ginsberg572 U.S. 273Apr 2, 2014 · 572 U.S. 273Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  6. Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc., dba Dan’s City Auto Body, Petitioner v. Robert Pelkey569 U.S. 251May 13, 2013 · 569 U.S. 251Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  7. Gloria Gail Kurns, Executrix of the Estate of George M. Corson, Deceased, et al., Petitioners v. Railroad Friction Products Corporation et al.565 U.S. 625Feb 29, 2012 · 565 U.S. 625Federalism6–36–3 band

  8. Keith Smith, et al., Petitioners v. Bayer Corporation564 U.S. 299Jun 16, 2011 · 564 U.S. 299Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  9. Richard A. Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Commerce Energy, Inc., et al.560 U.S. 413Jun 1, 2010 · 560 U.S. 413Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  10. Jose Ernesto Medellin v. TexasLandmark · Foreign552 U.S. 491Mar 25, 2008 · 552 U.S. 491Federalism6–36–3 band

  11. Warner-Lambert Co., LLC, et al. v. Kimberly Kent et al.552 U.S. 440Mar 3, 2008 · 552 U.S. 440Federalism4–45–4 band
  12. Arnold M. Preston v. Alex E. Ferrer552 U.S. 346Feb 20, 2008 · 552 U.S. 346Federalism8–18–1 band

  13. Donna S. Riegel, Individually and As Administrator of the Estate of Charles R. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.552 U.S. 312Feb 20, 2008 · 552 U.S. 312Federalism8–18–1 band

  14. Dennis Bates, et al. v. Dow Agrosciences LLC544 U.S. 431Apr 27, 2005 · 544 U.S. 431Federalism7–27–2 band

  15. Rex R. Sprietsma, Administrator of the Estate of Jeanne Sprietsma, Deceased v. Mercury Marine, a Division of Brunswick Corporation537 U.S. 51Dec 3, 2002 · 537 U.S. 51Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  16. Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Dedra Shanklin, Individually, and As Next Friend of Jessie Guy Shanklin529 U.S. 344Apr 17, 2000 · 529 U.S. 344Federalism7–27–2 band
  17. Medtronic, Inc. v. Lora Lohr et vir518 U.S. 470Jun 26, 1996 · 518 U.S. 470Federalism5–45–4 band
  18. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. Grant T. Norris512 U.S. 246Jun 20, 1994 · 512 U.S. 246Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  19. American Dredging Company v. William Robert Miller510 U.S. 443Feb 23, 1994 · 510 U.S. 443Federalism7–27–2 band
  20. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Lizzie Beatrice Easterwood507 U.S. 658Apr 21, 1993 · 507 U.S. 658Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  21. Thomas Cipollone, Individually and As Executor of the Estate of Rose D. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., et al.505 U.S. 504Jun 24, 1992 · 505 U.S. 504Federalism7–27–2 band

  22. United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Rawson, Individually and As Guardian Ad Litem for Rawson, et al.495 U.S. 362May 14, 1990 · 495 U.S. 362Federalism6–36–3 band
  23. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Donnelly494 U.S. 820Apr 17, 1990 · 494 U.S. 820Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  24. Tafflin et al. v. Levitt et al.493 U.S. 455Jan 22, 1990 · 493 U.S. 455Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  25. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Graham et al.489 U.S. 838Mar 29, 1989 · 489 U.S. 838Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  26. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.486 U.S. 399Jun 6, 1988 · 486 U.S. 399Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  27. Caterpillar Inc. et al. v. Williams et al.482 U.S. 386Jun 9, 1987 · 482 U.S. 386Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  28. Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. Dedeaux481 U.S. 41Apr 6, 1987 · 481 U.S. 41Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  29. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck471 U.S. 202Apr 16, 1985 · 471 U.S. 202Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  30. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale et al.463 U.S. 491Jun 30, 1983 · 463 U.S. 491Federalism6–36–3 band
  31. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board461 U.S. 731May 31, 1983 · 461 U.S. 731Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  32. Block, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. v. North Dakota ex rel. Board of University and School Lands461 U.S. 273May 2, 1983 · 461 U.S. 273Federalism8–18–1 band
  33. Local 926, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Jones460 U.S. 669Apr 4, 1983 · 460 U.S. 669Federalism6–36–3 band
  34. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. Hall et al.453 U.S. 571Jul 2, 1981 · 453 U.S. 571Federalism5–36–3 band
  35. Gulf Offshore Co., a Division of Pool Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp. et al.453 U.S. 473Jul 1, 1981 · 453 U.S. 473Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  36. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.450 U.S. 311Mar 9, 1981 · 450 U.S. 311Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  37. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters436 U.S. 180May 15, 1978 · 436 U.S. 180Federalism6–36–3 band
  38. Farmer, Special Admininistrator v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25, et al.430 U.S. 290Mar 7, 1977 · 430 U.S. 290Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  39. Lodge 76, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission et al.427 U.S. 132Jun 25, 1976 · 427 U.S. 132Federalism6–36–3 band
  40. American Radio Assn., AFL-CIO, et al. v. Mobile Steamship Assn., Inc., et al.419 U.S. 215Dec 17, 1974 · 419 U.S. 215Federalism5–45–4 band
  41. William E. Arnold Co. v. Carpenters District Council of Jacksonville and Vicinity et al.417 U.S. 12May 20, 1974 · 417 U.S. 12Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  42. Windward Shipping (London) Ltd. et al. v. American Radio Association, AFL-CIO, et al.415 U.S. 104Feb 19, 1974 · 415 U.S. 104Federalism6–36–3 band
  43. National Labor Relations Board v. Nashfinch Co., dba Jack & Jill Stores404 U.S. 138Dec 6, 1971 · 404 U.S. 138Federalism5–27–2 band
  44. Taggart et al. v. Weinacker's, Inc.397 U.S. 223Mar 9, 1970 · 397 U.S. 223Federalism6–27–2 band
  45. International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Ariadne Shipping Co., Ltd., et al.397 U.S. 195Mar 9, 1970 · 397 U.S. 195Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  46. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, et al.390 U.S. 557Apr 8, 1968 · 390 U.S. 557Federalism9–0Unanimous band

  47. Linn v. United Plant Guard Workers of America, Local 114, et al.383 U.S. 53Feb 21, 1966 · 383 U.S. 53Federalism5–45–4 band
  48. Hanna Mining Co. et al. v. District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, AFL-CIO, et al.382 U.S. 181Dec 6, 1965 · 382 U.S. 181Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  49. Radio & Television Broadcast Technicians Local Union 1264, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Broadcast Service of Mobile, Inc.380 U.S. 255Mar 15, 1965 · 380 U.S. 255Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  50. Liner et al. v. Jafco, Inc., et al.375 U.S. 301Jan 6, 1964 · 375 U.S. 301Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  51. Retail Clerks International Association, Local 1625, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Schermerhorn et al.375 U.S. 96Dec 2, 1963 · 375 U.S. 96Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  52. Local No. 207, International Association of Bridge, Structural and Ornamental Iron Workers Union, et al. v. Perko373 U.S. 701Jun 3, 1963 · 373 U.S. 701Federalism6–27–2 band
  53. Local 100, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices, v. Borden373 U.S. 690Jun 3, 1963 · 373 U.S. 690Federalism6–27–2 band
  54. Incres Steamship Co., Ltd., v. International Maritime Workers Union et al.372 U.S. 24Feb 18, 1963 · 372 U.S. 24Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  55. Local No. 438 Construction & General Laborers' Union, AFL-CIO, v. Curry et al., Doing Business As S. J. Curry & Co.371 U.S. 542Jan 21, 1963 · 371 U.S. 542Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  56. Smith v. Evening News Association371 U.S. 195Dec 10, 1962 · 371 U.S. 195Federalism8–18–1 band
  57. Marine Engineers Beneficial Association et al. v. Interlake Steamship Co. et al.370 U.S. 173Jun 11, 1962 · 370 U.S. 173Federalism7–18–1 band
  58. Charles Dowd Box Co., Inc., v. Courtney et al.368 U.S. 502Feb 19, 1962 · 368 U.S. 502Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  59. Superior Court of Washington for King County et al. v. Washington ex rel. Yellow Cab Service, Inc.361 U.S. 373Jan 25, 1960 · 361 U.S. 373Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  60. Plumbers, Steamfitters, Refrigeration, Petroleum Fitters, and Apprentices of Local 298, A. F. of L., et al. v. County of Door et al.359 U.S. 354May 4, 1959 · 359 U.S. 354Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  61. San Diego Building Trades Council et al. v. Garmon et al.359 U.S. 236Apr 20, 1959 · 359 U.S. 236Federalism5–45–4 band
  62. Hotel Employees Union, Local No. 255, et al. v. Sax Enterprises, Inc., et al.358 U.S. 270Jan 12, 1959 · 358 U.S. 270Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  63. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW-CIO) et al. v. Russell356 U.S. 634May 26, 1958 · 356 U.S. 634Federalism6–27–2 band
  64. International Association of Machinists et al. v. Gonzales356 U.S. 617May 26, 1958 · 356 U.S. 617Federalism6–27–2 band
  65. Youngdahl et al. v. Rainfair, Inc.355 U.S. 131Dec 9, 1957 · 355 U.S. 131Federalism6–36–3 band
  66. San Diego Building Trades Council et al. v. Garmon et al.353 U.S. 26Mar 25, 1957 · 353 U.S. 26Federalism6–27–2 band
  67. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local No. 427, AFL, et al. v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc.353 U.S. 20Mar 25, 1957 · 353 U.S. 20Federalism6–27–2 band
  68. Guss, Doing Business As Photo Sound Products Manufacturing Co., v. Utah Labor Relations Board353 U.S. 1Mar 25, 1957 · 353 U.S. 1Federalism6–27–2 band
  69. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.351 U.S. 266Jun 4, 1956 · 351 U.S. 266Federalism6–36–3 band
  70. United Mine Workers of America et al. v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.351 U.S. 62Apr 23, 1956 · 351 U.S. 62Federalism7–18–1 band
  71. Local Union No. 25 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America et al. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.350 U.S. 155Jan 9, 1956 · 350 U.S. 155Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  72. General Drivers, Warehousemen, and Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.348 U.S. 978Apr 4, 1955 · 348 U.S. 978Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  73. Weber et al. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.348 U.S. 468Mar 28, 1955 · 348 U.S. 468Federalism8–0Unanimous band
  74. United Construction Workers et al. v. Laburnum Construction Corp.347 U.S. 656Jun 7, 1954 · 347 U.S. 656Federalism6–27–2 band
  75. Capital Service, Inc. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board347 U.S. 501May 17, 1954 · 347 U.S. 501Federalism7–18–1 band
  76. Garner et al., Trading As Central Storage & Transfer Co., v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Local Union No. 776 (A. F. L.) et al.346 U.S. 485Dec 14, 1953 · 346 U.S. 485Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  77. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Railway Co.339 U.S. 255Apr 10, 1950 · 339 U.S. 255Federalism7–18–1 band
  78. Slocum, General Chairman, Lackawanna Division No. 30, Order of Railroad Telegraphers, v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad Co.339 U.S. 239Apr 10, 1950 · 339 U.S. 239Federalism7–18–1 band
  79. Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board336 U.S. 301Mar 7, 1949 · 336 U.S. 301Federalism7–27–2 band
  80. La Crosse Telephone Corp. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board et al.336 U.S. 18Jan 17, 1949 · 336 U.S. 18Federalism9–0Unanimous band
  81. Schwabacher et al. v. United States et al.334 U.S. 182May 3, 1948 · 334 U.S. 182Federalism5–36–3 band
Data notes

Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.

Report a correction

Official record

Read the full opinion on Justia and the argument audio on Oyez. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.