National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co., Inc. et al.
341 U.S. 665 · No. 313 · 1950 term · Vinson Court
Decided Jun 4, 1951 · argued Feb 27, 1951
Unions · Labor-management disputes: secondary activity
Majority opinion: Harold Burton
The voteMajority
9–09 in the majority, 0 in dissent
No dissent (9–0)
Reversed. National Labor Relations Board won.
What this ruling means
Reversed: the Supreme Court overturned the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, and its own ruling ends the case.
National Labor Relations Board was the petitioner, the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the case. “Won” means the Court gave that side the result it asked for.
From the Supreme Court Database. A justice who agreed with the result but not the reasoning counts in the majority.
Summary
The opening of the case’s Wikipedia article: what the case was about and what the Court held.
Wikipedia has no article on this case, so there is no summary.
Data notes
The text is Wikipedia’s (CC BY-SA 4.0), matched to the case by its citation, docket number or name and year, and is not checked against the opinion. The site keeps the article’s opening section, ending on its last full sentence. The one-sentence summary under the title is the Decisions list’s: Wikipedia’s own ruling sentence, or, tagged “AI-written”, one Claude wrote from this opening.
How the justices voted
Each justice who took part, placed by their Martin–Quinn ideology score for the 1950 term. Filled: the 9 in the majority. Hollow: the 0 in dissent. Colour is the party of the president who appointed them.
Majority(9)
Harold BurtonWrote the majority opinion
Hugo BlackJoined the majority
William DouglasJoined the majority
Felix FrankfurterJoined the majority
Robert JacksonJoined the majority
Tom ClarkJoined the majority
Stanley ReedJoined the majority
Frederick VinsonJoined the majority
Sherman MintonJoined the majority
Dissent(0)
- None.
Data notes
Each justice’s vote and what they wrote are from the justice-centered file of the Supreme Court Database. “Wrote a concurrence” means the justice sided with the majority and wrote separately; a justice who dissented in part is counted on the side they took overall. A justice who wrote nothing is listed as joining their side.
Positions are each justice’s Martin–Quinn score for the case’s term, the same scores as the Ideology page: negative is more liberal, positive more conservative. A score sums up a justice’s votes across the whole term, so it says where they usually sit, not why they voted as they did here. The median line is the Court’s median justice that term.
The parties
Who brought the case to the Court, who answered it, and how it got there.
- Petitioner
- National Labor Relations BoardNational Labor Relations Board, or regional office or officer
- Respondent
- International Rice Milling Co., Inc. et al.Employer
- Reached the Court by
- Certiorari (the Court chose to hear it)
- Why it was taken
- Federal appeals courts had ruled differently, and the question was important
Data notes
The names are the two sides of the case’s title. The description under each is the Supreme Court Database’s category for that party, in its own wording. The petitioner is the side that asked the Supreme Court to review the decision below. “Why it was taken” appears only when the majority opinion says lower courts disagreed or were unsure about the question; reasons that would fit any case (“to resolve the question presented”, “an important question”) are left out.
The law at issue
The law the Court was asked to apply, and the kind of power it used to decide.
- Provision
- Labor-Management Relations
- Kind of law
- Federal Statute
- Decided by
- Interpretation of administrative regulation or rule, or executive order; Statutory construction
Data notes
The Supreme Court Database codes the main constitutional provision, statute or court rule each case turned on, and the basis of the decision: judicial review of a federal or state law, interpreting a statute, supervising the lower courts, and so on. A case can rest on more than one. “Overruled” counts only where the majority opinion says so.
Timeline
What happened at the Court and how the case got there, newest first.
- Jun 4, 1951DecidedDecided · Decided 9–0: reversed. National Labor Relations Board won.
- Feb 27, 1951ArguedArgued · Oral argument before the Court.
- Not datedTaken upTaken up · The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case (certiorari). Federal appeals courts had ruled differently, and the question was important.
- Not datedCourt belowCourt below · Began in and was decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit: vacated and remanded.
Data notes
From the Supreme Court Database: the court the case began in, the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed and what that court did, how the case came to the Court, and the dates of argument and decision. The database does not date the steps in the lower courts. Court names are the database’s.
Other decisions on the same issue
10 other argued cases since 1946 on labor-management disputes: secondary activity, newest first.
- Burlington Northern Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes et al.481 U.S. 429Apr 28, 1987 · 481 U.S. 429Unions9–0Unanimous band
- Edward J. Debartolo Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.463 U.S. 147Jun 24, 1983 · 463 U.S. 147Unions9–0Unanimous band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001, Retail Clerks International Assn., AFL-CIO, et al.447 U.S. 607Jun 20, 1980 · 447 U.S. 607Unions6–36–3 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 825, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO400 U.S. 297Jan 12, 1971 · 400 U.S. 297Unions7–27–2 band
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.394 U.S. 369Mar 25, 1969 · 394 U.S. 369Unions4–36–3 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Servette, Inc.377 U.S. 46Apr 20, 1964 · 377 U.S. 46Unions9–0Unanimous band
- Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, A. F. L., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board357 U.S. 93Jun 16, 1958 · 357 U.S. 93Unions6–36–3 band
- Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, A. F. of L., et al. v. National Labor Relations Board341 U.S. 707Jun 4, 1951 · 341 U.S. 707Unions6–36–3 band
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers et al. v. National Labor Relations Board341 U.S. 694Jun 4, 1951 · 341 U.S. 694Unions6–36–3 band
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades Council et al.341 U.S. 675Jun 4, 1951 · 341 U.S. 675Unions6–36–3 band
Data notes
Every other orally argued case with a clear vote, from the 1946 term on, that the Supreme Court Database files under the same issue as this one. The database gives each case one issue from a list of about 270 (abortion, search and seizure of vehicles, the death penalty, and so on), whatever law it turned on.
Official record
Read the full opinion on Justia. Case data from the Supreme Court Database, Version 2026 Release 01, through the 2025 term.